Asus X556UV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X556UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556UV
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 21:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 87
2-Core 155
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 235
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 10EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 176 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 390
Write 155
Mixed 167
SusWrite 174
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 9.8
70% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 75
84% 141 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
63GB free
Firmware: AM0B3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 77 85 81 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 84.6
Write 87.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 81.6
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15C4
Typical X556UV Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback