Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics388% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 21:05
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$545
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 210
2-Core 418
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,596
143% 1,209 Pts
64-Core 3,676
228% 3,676 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 116%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
388% Outstanding
Lighting 628
Reflection 557
Parallax 694
512% 626 fps
MRender 507
Gravity 552
Splatting 300
355% 453 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 388%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,809
Write 4,046
Mixed 3,170
752% 3,341 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 74.2
241% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,582
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,335
999% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 587%
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,825
Write 4,071
Mixed 2,310
619% 2,735 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 52.9
197% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,635
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,386
1,042% 1,401 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
227% Outstanding
MC Read 145
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 63.5
251% 88 GB/s
SC Read 47.1
SC Write 61.7
SC Mixed 51.8
153% 53.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 233%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 360 27.4" 1280 720 MSI3CD7 MPG271QX OLED
Typical PRIME X670-P WIFI Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670-P WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback