Asrock 880G Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 880G Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 555
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 37
2-Core 39.7
37% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 38.6
8-Core 42
5% 40.3 Pts
64-Core 46.8
3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 838C) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 18
Parallax 2.7
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi550 S3 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 273 287 300 296 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 303
Write 305
Mixed 298
SusWrite 273
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 13.9
69% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 24.4
31% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-096.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.9
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM71DD LS32AG32x
Typical 880G Extreme3 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880G Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback