Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140124
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 14:44
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 118
51% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 137
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Legend(17AA 380D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3129
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi550 S3 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 85 72 66 69 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 300
Write 223
Mixed 122
SusWrite 76.7
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 8.7
55% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 22
46% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback