Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 UD  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime28.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 18:22
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 67.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,071
97% 817 Pts
64-Core 2,170
134% 2,170 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 177
Parallax 195
134% 179 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 158
Splatting 130
129% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2227 2948 2980 3123 3091 3135 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,587
Write 3,221
Mixed 2,858
SusWrite 2,917
656% 2,896 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 102
331% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 1,117
845% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 436%
Great: 526%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
419GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 446 454 446 454 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 414
SusWrite 449
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 56.4
183% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 197
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
423GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 446 454 446 455 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 444
Mixed 424
SusWrite 449
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 55.7
175% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
36GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 362 362 360 362 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 428
Mixed 424
SusWrite 374
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 56.8
185% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 23.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 100 34.1" 1280 720 SAM730B S34CG50
Typical GA-X570 UD Builds (Compare 1,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback