Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 16:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 13.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 224
60% 123 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 544
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 44%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14000.61002
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 22
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 17.7
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 560 652 536 576 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 113
Mixed 415
SusWrite 518
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 15.3
91% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 433
368% 540 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 244%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
453GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 123 129 131 136 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 103
Write 98.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 127
61% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 281
14% 281 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 4R 0G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 27% 51 52 27 144 24.1" 1920 1009 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback