MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCX
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 14:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 81
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 125
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.7
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 207 203 198 179 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 895
Write 757
Mixed 862
SusWrite 220
153% 684 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 27
96% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 159
123% 169 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback