MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 29 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 11:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 250
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 556
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 4.7
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.1
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G-1032 512GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 129 88 52 51 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 1,013
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 200
223% 1,003 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 78.5
273% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 599
DQ Mixed 642
489% 664 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 189%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 13 188 9 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback