Acer Aspire T3-715

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire T3-715 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire T3-715
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 10 '24 at 10:07
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 195 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 542 55% 443 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Asus(1043 8712) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	129% Outstanding	Lighting 173 Reflection 174 Parallax 192 141% 179 fps	MRender 196 Gravity 154 Splatting 127 126% 159 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB 3,328 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: T871202 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 470 Write 423 Mixed 359 93% 417 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 42.6 139% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 283 221% 307 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 31GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 255 228 207 191 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 421 Mixed 379 SusWrite 239 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 48.9 163% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 331 250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 89GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 61 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 102 Write 98.9 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 62.8 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSC.16FARG Kingston ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 16GB 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 20.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 20.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	11%	57	211	57	60	27.9"	2560 1440	ACR0460 Acer XB281HK

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire T3-715 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire T3-715

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	43x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	18x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
CV3-8D128 128GBLiteonBench 68%, 3,328 samples	6x
RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128GBKingstonBench 71%, 1,315 samples	4x
RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 256GBKingstonBench 73%, 2,871 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	9x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	4x
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $179

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16