Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:37
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 562
52% 437 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 113
90% 107 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 90.5
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 255 243 245 246 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 436
Write 417
Mixed 377
SusWrite 262
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 28.7
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 342
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
42GB free
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 208 207 210 209 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 412
Write 213
Mixed 232
SusWrite 208
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 20.2
74% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 157
143% 220 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 84%
Tammuz SSD 1TB
318GB free
Firmware: 0200H311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 377 371 304 94 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 413
Write 388
Mixed 335
SusWrite 264
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 26.6
94% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 232
196% 286 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 461 10 75 34.1" 2560 1017 GSM7757 LG HDR WFHD
Typical GA-H97-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-Gaming 3 - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback