__________________________________ _______

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 429%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 548%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics378% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive436% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System__________________________________ _______  (all builds)
Motherboard__________________________________ ________________________________
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:30
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 211
2-Core 418
123% 238 Pts
4-Core 819
8-Core 1,597
143% 1,208 Pts
64-Core 3,549
220% 3,549 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Device(7377 1300) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
378% Outstanding
Lighting 618
Reflection 564
Parallax 743
504% 642 fps
MRender 499
Gravity 535
Splatting 263
337% 432 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 378%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2963 1771 1773 1770 1784 1776 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
436% Outstanding
Read 2,809
Write 3,281
Mixed 3,020
SusWrite 1973
625% 2,771 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 119
392% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,921
DQ Write 1,725
DQ Mixed 1,837
1,374% 1,828 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 436%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
867GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3243 3215 3212 3211 3191 1812 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
496% Outstanding
Read 2,830
Write 3,338
Mixed 3,048
SusWrite 2,981
690% 3,049 MB/s
4K Read 80.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 120
392% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,864
DQ Write 1685
DQ Mixed 1,784
1,335% 1,778 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 496%
Great: 526%
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
594GB free
Firmware: H230406a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3887 1891 402 472 475 498 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 4,149
Write 4,212
Mixed 3193
SusWrite 1271
718% 3,206 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 111
379% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,879
DQ Write 1,254
DQ Mixed 1659
1,213% 1,598 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 431%
Great: 520%
Gxf-1tb PRO 1TB
29GB free
Firmware: SN11273
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4,107
Write 3,190
Mixed 2,990
761% 3,429 MB/s
4K Read 76.3
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 106
358% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 2,188
DQ Write 1,848
DQ Mixed 1,630
1,327% 1,888 MB/s
Poor: 387% Great: 512%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
342% Outstanding
MC Read 261
MC Write 67.1
MC Mixed 85.1
393% 138 GB/s
SC Read 46.4
SC Write 76.7
SC Mixed 56.9
171% 60 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 342%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 4R 10G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 11% 9 203 32 360 24.5" 1920 1080 LHCFFFF P25A2K
History: Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B | Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B | Score 66: 0P 5R 10G 11B | Score 58: 0P 4R 10G 8B
Typical _______ Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: __________________________________ _______

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback