Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:11
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 331
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,205
110% 921 Pts
64-Core 1,606
99% 1,606 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 107
Parallax 150
133% 140 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 125
Splatting 101
110% 139 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2326 2428 2487 2681 2677 2686 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,053
Write 2,609
Mixed 2,314
SusWrite 2,548
540% 2,381 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 98.2
321% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 996
738% 982 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 381%
Great: 604%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
126GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 195 245 219 242 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 496
Write 469
Mixed 301
SusWrite 226
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 37.1
145% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 129
104% 150 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 25 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
116GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 19 17 24 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 16 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
MICRONET FANTOM DRIVE 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 12 15 13 7.7 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 28.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 34" 3440 1369 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback