Toshiba Satellite L75-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L75-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 0680
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 05:01
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 78.7
42% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 115
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F830) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.9
4% 3.87 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 512GB 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 8.8 8.9 9.1 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 400
Write 346
Mixed 319
SusWrite 32.6
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 17.4
56% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 46.5
52% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 44 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1736
Typical Satellite L75-C Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L75-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback