Lenovo 20HJS3M900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20HJS3M900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS3M900
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 146
34% 227 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 16
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg5aznv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5111AALA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 473 329 298 299 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 812
Write 336
Mixed 374
SusWrite 336
103% 464 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 18.3
75% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 290
228% 317 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 15% 40 67 54 60 15.6" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20HJS3M900 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HJS3M900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback