Alienware Aurora R12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R12  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07W25T
Memory48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 01:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 288
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 655
76% 590 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Dell(1028 3907) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3070
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 223
Reflection 214
Parallax 203
182% 214 fps
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
129% 147 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron 2300 256GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 23000030 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,290
Write 1,418
Mixed 1,217
293% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 12.8
136% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 956
DQ Mixed 939
696% 911 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 223%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
927GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 179 174 116 108 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 199
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 144
112% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP32G4DFRA32A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 26.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACR0424 Acer V246HQL
Typical Aurora R12 Builds (Compare 2,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback