Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 23:21
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 175
2-Core 306
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 961
91% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 40E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 124
Parallax 123
113% 129 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 93.7
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 850 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0707A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2265 2402 2426 418 610 537 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 1,934
Write 2,340
Mixed 1749
SusWrite 1443
421% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 32
245% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1287
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 946
749% 1,051 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 284%
Great: 360%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
27GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,900
Write 8,083
Mixed 7505
1,751% 7,829 MB/s
4K Read 695
4K Write 340
4K Mixed 370
1,707% 468 MB/s
DQ Read 1859
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,338
1,044% 1,454 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Adata LEGEND 850 512GB
142GB free
Firmware: W0309A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,090
Write 2,698
Mixed 1943
503% 2,244 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 60
239% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,207
883% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 170% Great: 360%
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V9002s94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1055 1056 1062 1062 1021 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,889
Write 976
Mixed 876
SusWrite 1,034
265% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 48.3
187% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 450
363% 500 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 219%
Great: 241%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 147 146 148 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 147
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 146
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
694GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 182 183 183 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 131
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 180
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
435% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 6600 C34 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
144% Outstanding
MC Read 53.2
MC Write 61.2
MC Mixed 53.8
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 29.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 200 29.5" 1280 720 XMIA014 Mi 30 HFCW
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback