Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-705
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 22:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 90
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 310
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 14.4
12% 13 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 15.2
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 182 11 49 23 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.6% Very poor
Read 217
Write 186
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 75.6
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
198GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 143 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 145
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ78E4 BenQ GW2470
Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback