Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 1 month ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago.

System	Acer Aspire XC-705 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire XC-705
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150611
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '24 at 16:00
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 324 44% 325 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 9.8 Parallax 14.4 13% 13.2 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 15.4 11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 163 8.9 57 12 46 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 237 Write 215 Mixed 206 SusWrite 84.7 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 1.1 51% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 21% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 198GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 146 146 147 148 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 159 Write 141 Mixed 74 SusWrite 146 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/8G 1x8GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 8.3 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	23.8"	1280 720	BNQ78E4 BenQ GW2470

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	140x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	44x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	38x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	50x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x

RAM
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	24x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	14x
ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 458 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16