HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FE
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime23.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:30
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 104
43% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 348
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 23.2
16% 20.1 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 16
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 544 376 404 390 377 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 731
Mixed 710
SusWrite 418
145% 646 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 37.8
128% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 402
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 277
206% 280 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 107%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1ME-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 18.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO3791
Typical Laptop 15s-fq2xxx Builds (Compare 2,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback