PC Intel Home Office II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC Intel Home Office II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B360M-A
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 19:09
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 559
65% 502 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$459
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 225
Parallax 225
210% 236 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 172
Splatting 140
148% 188 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 171%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2243
Write 1,978
Mixed 1,385
415% 1,869 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 50.1
179% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 664
509% 695 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 200 187 197 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 127
Write 160
Mixed 72
SusWrite 193
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 20 240 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2510 AG251FWG2
Typical Intel Home Office II Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: PC Intel Home Office II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback