Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 17:56
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 284
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 709
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 6
4% 7.17 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.2
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 15
22% 26.3 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 17.9
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,613
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,405
343% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 78.6
292% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1132
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 945
725% 988 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08B3
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback