HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 17:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 550
55% 448 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2306) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.3
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 69 91 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 82.5
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
113GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 95 98 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 126
Write 27.6
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 95.9
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 23% 60 149 55 75 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback