Acer Aspire A315-56

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-56  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Sleepy_IL
Memory13.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210309
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 13:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
UC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 162
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 224
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1422) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.9
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5.6
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1193 1335 1411 1050 380 335 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,600
Mixed 1342
SusWrite 951
296% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 61.7
226% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 583
437% 591 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 208%
Great: 315%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 116 119 120 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical Aspire A315-56 Builds (Compare 1,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback