| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 15.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191029 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 09 '24 at 13:07 |
| Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
73.1%
Very good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
61% 518 Pts
|
107% 1,727 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
16% 23.7 fps
|
20% 24.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAP20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 17 7.1 6.5 6.9 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
29% 129 MB/s
|
22% 7.1 MB/s
|
27% 34.2 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 8x4GB
8 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.2%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
18% 221 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8% | 12% | 32 | 25 | 5 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | PHLC164 PHL 328E8Q |
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,418 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 148x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 130x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 172x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |