Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics404% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE  (all builds)
Memory88.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 11:53
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 213
2-Core 423
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 840
8-Core 1,641
147% 1,241 Pts
64-Core 3,719
230% 3,719 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 5500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
404% Outstanding
Lighting 653
Reflection 596
Parallax 765
532% 672 fps
MRender 530
Gravity 604
Splatting 302
374% 479 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 404%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000T700SSD3 2TB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,260
Write 6,572
Mixed 3,208
1,188% 5,347 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 33.2
183% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,574
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1334
978% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 432% Great: 881%
Corsair VoyagerGT 16GB
14GB free, PID 1a90
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.1
Write 19.2
Mixed 12
24% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP96GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
269% Outstanding
MC Read 169
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 81.1
299% 105 GB/s
SC Read 49.7
SC Write 74.2
SC Mixed 57.5
173% 60.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 269%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 289%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $1,457
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback