Dell Latitude E5440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E5440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NVM8Y
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 10:27
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 107
54% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05DE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 188 188 190 177 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69% Good
Read 366
Write 244
Mixed 279
SusWrite 186
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 30.2
106% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 233
174% 232 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 4% 26 95 41 60 14" 1280 720 AUO203E
Typical Latitude E5440 Builds (Compare 1,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback