PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AE8h |
Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090819 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '24 at 09:21 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 117 23 91 15 91 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB
21GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 26 25 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 45 | 9 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HPN346A HP E243 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 298x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 275x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 255x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 124x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 99x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 53x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |