Asus ZenBook UX482EA_UX482EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX482EA_UX482EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX482EA
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime26.9 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 08:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 37.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 221
64% 125 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 427
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1382) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 25.3
16% 24.2 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 4.7
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 1153 1216 1235 1250 1194 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 27.6
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 1,029
170% 787 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 15.8
96% 22 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 173%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 33.4
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 10.9
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 14" 1280 720 AUOA48F
Typical ZenBook UX482EA_UX482EA Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX482EA_UX482EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback