bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel D34010WYK
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150410
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 06:05
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 80.2
36% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 98.1
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 143 136 93 134 101 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 72.4
Write 94.3
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 127
21% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 8
14% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 92%
Intel SSDMCEAW120A4 120GB
34GB free
Firmware: DC33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 118 122 133 116 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 258
Write 144
Mixed 125
SusWrite 120
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 2.5
11% 4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 32 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback