Asrock X670E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 409%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 544%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics395% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive649% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory179.9 GB free of 192 GB
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 04:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$492
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 64.4
1-Core 204
2-Core 412
114% 227 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,567
141% 1,189 Pts
64-Core 3,497
216% 3,497 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Lighting 643
Reflection 589
Parallax 784
524% 672 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 575
Splatting 276
360% 462 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 395%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT4000T700SSD3 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5189 5062 5089 5155 5119 5166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
649% Outstanding
Read 5,458
Write 5319
Mixed 3,416
SusWrite 5,130
1,087% 4,831 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 70.5
227% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 1,308
903% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 381%
This bench: 649%
Great: 999%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5600J4040D48G 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 106
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 46.6
181% 63.5 GB/s
SC Read 42.2
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 38.8
118% 41.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 165%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 48.8" 1280 720 SAM71AA LS49AG95
Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback