MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 548%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics395% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive561% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D68
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 1100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 00:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 202
2-Core 402
123% 233 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,020
117% 913 Pts
64-Core 3,784
234% 3,784 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3420 MHz, MLim: 6061 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Lighting 641
Reflection 564
Parallax 731
523% 645 fps
MRender 493
Gravity 585
Splatting 303
361% 460 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 395%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4164 4190 4267 4398 4400 4407 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
561% Outstanding
Read 3,047
Write 4,617
Mixed 3,412
SusWrite 4,304
873% 3,845 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 98.6
318% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,928
DQ Write 1,538
DQ Mixed 1,734
1,298% 1,734 MB/s
Poor: 268%
This bench: 561%
Great: 635%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
150% Outstanding
MC Read 87.5
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 39.8
157% 55.1 GB/s
SC Read 44.8
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 47.4
124% 43.4 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 150%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 540 24.1" 1280 720 AUS24B5 ROG PG248QP
Typical MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68) Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $2,335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback