Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics265% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 23:04
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 99.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1152
108% 897 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
Asus(1043 8958) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3180 MHz, MLim: 5500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Lighting 397
Reflection 385
Parallax 463
324% 415 fps
MRender 485
Gravity 315
Splatting 244
272% 348 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 265%
Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG70S1TB 1TB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,793
Write 4118
Mixed 2,326
622% 2,746 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 75.9
240% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,277
920% 1,193 MB/s
Poor: 211% Great: 512%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,935
Write 3,531
Mixed 2,254
581% 2,574 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 68.2
222% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 1,166
838% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.5
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 35.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.4
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 32.7
122% 32.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 160 32" 1280 720 MSI3DC7 MSI MAG323UPF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback