HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 172
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 261
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 87BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 195
Reflection 174
Parallax 163
159% 177 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 170 53 39 42 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 690
Write 595
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 121
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 5
63% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 121
138% 250 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 305%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
54GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 399 263 72 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 467
Write 337
Mixed 330
SusWrite 209
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 38
118% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 127
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 102%
P3-1TB 1TB
389GB free
Firmware: H230915a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 396 396 377 381 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 408
Write 429
Mixed 396
SusWrite 387
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 36.3
122% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 269
203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 22.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN366C HP 24mh
Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback