PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20190514 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | May 08 '24 at 18:23 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
58.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 340 331 300 270 340 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
486GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 179 163 156 183 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 25 | 5 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 1360 | ACR0917 ED322Q P |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,316x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,164x |
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 137x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 576x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 310x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 267x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $268 |