Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 18:04
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 512
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 42
37% 44.8 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 36.8
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 82 87 85 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 399
Write 95.9
Mixed 121
SusWrite 82.2
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 18
69% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 41.2
36% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 73%
Kingston SKC2500M82000G 2TB
134GB free
Firmware: S7781101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 584 592 661 668 672 672 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 1,054
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 641
226% 1,007 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 57.9
191% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 603
452% 606 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 176%
Great: 395%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
434GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 141 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 138
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 92.8
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 99U5474-028.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 144 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BB8 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback