Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H510M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 17:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 659
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 44.4
40% 47.1 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 38.5
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX512GSSDSATA3 512GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 301 333 304 329 281 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 426
Write 314
Mixed 313
SusWrite 311
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 13.8
55% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 26.7
49% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 95%
Adata SU650 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: V1006A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 324 349 169 88 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 389
Write 312
Mixed 351
SusWrite 220
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 2.5
39% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 105%
MM1000GFJTE 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: HPG5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 107 105 107 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 106
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
247% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5C03 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical H510M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback