Exper FLEXDEX592

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemExper FLEXDEX592  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 80.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 701
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7C09) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 406 401 372 370 369 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 402
Mixed 387
SusWrite 389
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 42.2
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 92.2
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 132
118% 171 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 7.2" 1280 720 RTK1D1A
Typical FLEXDEX592 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Exper FLEXDEX592

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback