TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 13:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 226
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 727
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 82.6%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.34
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 101
Parallax 105
92% 106 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 84.8
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 88.6%
 Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 183 273 194 194 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 910
Write 744
Mixed 866
SusWrite 225
154% 686 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 43.3
146% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 789
599% 813 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑
This bench: 132%
 Great: 219%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
2TB free
Firmware: VP01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 201 211 205 206 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 177
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 203
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 99%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2J1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 27.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 84.5%
 Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples2,901x
Core i5-10400Intel  $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples533x
Core i3-10100Intel  $92Bench 80%, 24,563 samples505x
GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia  $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples1,288x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples1,010x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples762x
SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg40znv512gBench 164%, 11,361 samples563x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples367x
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBNvmeBench 157%, 2,402 samples310x
RAM
HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9,246 samples438x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 2,680 samples283x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples273x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback