Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 13:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 174
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 599
53% 451 Pts
64-Core 1,296
80% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8461) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.2
6% 6.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 433 423 409 416 418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 394
Write 423
Mixed 355
SusWrite 422
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 11.4
94% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 15.5
77% 172 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
851GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 113 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 149
Write 151
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 113
153% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
210% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 132 57 60 32" 1280 720 SDA0000
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback