Dell G15 5520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell G15 5520  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 053JTT
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 11:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 170
2-Core 325
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 582
72% 547 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B64) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.2
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 15.3
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9B1 Samsung 512GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 46305039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 1431 1664 1775 1863 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2134
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,679
SusWrite 1,340
414% 1,844 MB/s
4K Read 80.2
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 106
360% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 827
DQ Mixed 908
672% 886 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 318%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG66AEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 45.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 25.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 39 120 15.5" 1280 720 NCP005F
Typical G15 5520 Builds (Compare 2,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell G15 5520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback