Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DNRR6
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 04:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 184
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 428
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B36) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3301
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 14.8
9% 13 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 11
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9B1 Samsung 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 46304039 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 525 602 601 754 799 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 781
Write 507
Mixed 761
SusWrite 619
150% 667 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 27.6
98% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 181
130% 171 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 12.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback