Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 24 days ago, 22 days ago, 16 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 09:52
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 725
73% 595 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX Vega
Sapphire(1DA2 E376) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 107
Parallax 163
87% 126 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 122
Splatting 75.5
77% 95.8 fps
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 656 658 654 653 551 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2323
Mixed 1,575
SusWrite 686
397% 1,778 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 75.1
251% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1091
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 922
679% 902 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 261%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
159GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1086 827 665 662 663 663 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 1253
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 761
264% 1,177 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 74
246% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 908
DQ Mixed 1,000
756% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 228%
Great: 340%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
223GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 214 200 204 216 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 259
Mixed 321
SusWrite 214
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 46.3
160% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 231
176% 236 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 36.6
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2720 VG278
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback