Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 350%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 400%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics306% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive572% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 09:47
Run Duration430 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 210
2-Core 421
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,663
148% 1,253 Pts
64-Core 2,463
152% 2,463 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$976
MSI(1462 5117) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
306% Outstanding
Lighting 466
Reflection 458
Parallax 491
379% 472 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 403
Splatting 265
314% 402 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 306%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4156 4074 4904 4365 2430 2580 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
572% Outstanding
Read 2,735
Write 4429
Mixed 2,970
SusWrite 3,752
788% 3,471 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 365
4K Mixed 137
475% 191 MB/s
DQ Read 2,181
DQ Write 1,713
DQ Mixed 1,852
1,412% 1,916 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 572%
Great: 573%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: 32B3T8EB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 974 986 983 974 970 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2221
Write 1,409
Mixed 1434
SusWrite 1,020
339% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 104
340% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 1067
DQ Mixed 678
632% 978 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 307%
Great: 373%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4395 4501 3643 3057 1830 1885 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
525% Outstanding
Read 2,682
Write 3,636
Mixed 3,038
SusWrite 3,218
713% 3,144 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 321
4K Mixed 120
409% 166 MB/s
DQ Read 2,321
DQ Write 1,919
DQ Mixed 2,125
1,590% 2,122 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 525%
Great: 614%
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4302 4392 4388 4391 4401 4508 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
602% Outstanding
Read 2,695
Write 3,090
Mixed 3,008
SusWrite 4,397
748% 3,297 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 324
4K Mixed 119
426% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 2,322
DQ Write 1,915
DQ Mixed 2,109
1,582% 2,115 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 602%
Great: 591%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2407 2412 2405 2364 2408 2407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
403% Outstanding
Read 1,809
Write 2,422
Mixed 1868
SusWrite 2,400
482% 2,125 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 88.9
343% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,639
DQ Write 1,942
DQ Mixed 1,610
1,264% 1,730 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 403%
Great: 391%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 67.3
MC Write 62.9
MC Mixed 59.2
180% 63.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 46.5
SC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 161%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 GBT270A G27FC
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 3,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,029
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback