MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 378%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 371%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics367% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 08:07
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 165
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,118
106% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,496
93% 1,496 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB; Palit OmniBlack 4090
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
367% Outstanding
Lighting 568
Reflection 588
Parallax 753
463% 637 fps
MRender 543
Gravity 578
Splatting 313
375% 478 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 367%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2_PCI_NVME_2TB_+DRAM_InnovationIT 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAU1RA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1555 1598 1653 1639 1658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 1,666
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 1,603
405% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 87.2
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1341
DQ Write 979
DQ Mixed 629
614% 983 MB/s
Poor: 209%
This bench: 342%
Great: 388%
Lexar NM790 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 12237
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3602 4381 4335 4371 4323 4362 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
607% Outstanding
Read 4,359
Write 4,754
Mixed 3404
SusWrite 4,229
944% 4,186 MB/s
4K Read 76.5
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 108
362% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,543
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,120
914% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 294%
This bench: 607%
Great: 648%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
427GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 243 241 247 244 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 156
Mixed 203
SusWrite 243
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 52
176% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 152
128% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 126%
Asmt ASM236X NVME 1TB
547GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 796 797 797 796 797 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 799
Mixed 751
SusWrite 796
179% 796 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 51.8
166% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 374
282% 379 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 151%
Great: 176%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
913GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 149 143 146 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 84.4
Write 76.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 145
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41.6
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 42.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 48.1
83% 48.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7255 Odyssey G8
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback