Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V13.1
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 07:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 551
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 59.6
46% 61.9 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 62.2
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 343 362 361 185 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 439
Write 348
Mixed 378
SusWrite 261
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 39.9
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 305
215% 270 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 91%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
818GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 105 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 59.1
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 105
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 144 23.8" 1920 1027 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TULPAR T7 V13.1 Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback