Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte AX370M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 03:28
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 624
62% 508 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 36.8
22% 30.6 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 25.9
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 420 429 422 414 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 1,637
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 537
262% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 55.1
183% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 735
536% 702 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 166%
Great: 253%
WDC WD40 PURZ-85AKKY0 4TB
418GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 0.5 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 134
Write 137
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 0.4
108% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 67%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
363GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.6 1.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 156
Write 124
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 1.1
111% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28%
Great: 77%
WDC WD20 EURX-63T0FY0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 135 138 137 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 136
172% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 135 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 176
Write 187
Mixed 153
SusWrite 136
220% 163 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
61% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 28.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 32 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC156 PHL 273V7
Typical GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback