Lenovo 20XW00FPUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 29 days ago.
SystemLenovo 20XW00FPUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20XW00FPUS
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 02:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 223
70% 133 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 410
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 22D5) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.8
2% 5.03 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 3.2
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GDE9X081N 512GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41730C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 404 316 397 406 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,146
SusWrite 394
253% 1,140 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 59.6
200% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 414
301% 399 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 178%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 35.7
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 14.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 11 60 14" 1280 720 LEN403A
Typical 20XW00FPUS Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20XW00FPUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback