Asus H110M-A/DP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/DP  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 18:38
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 180
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 552
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 8.3
8% 14.3 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 19.1
13% 15 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 85 84 84 81 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 372
Write 93.9
Mixed 124
SusWrite 86.4
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 17.2
71% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 110
79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
871GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 162 161 160 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 144
Write 123
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 155
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 0.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/DP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback