Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 258%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 132%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive489% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory85.9 GB free of 96 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 246
2-Core 485
140% 272 Pts
4-Core 948
8-Core 1,843
165% 1,395 Pts
64-Core 4,344
269% 4,344 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 132%
Great: 135%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8882) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 12
9% 13.1 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 272
Parallax 291
234% 283 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 248
Splatting 194
212% 269 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 201%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST8000DX001-3GK101 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: FC02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 252 236 215 179 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 249
Write 249
Mixed 130
SusWrite 227
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 1.9
4% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 56%
Nvme PCIe SSD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4414 1619 1379 1387 1381 1383 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
489% Outstanding
Read 2,970
Write 5,064
Mixed 3567
SusWrite 1,927
766% 3,382 MB/s
4K Read 89.8
4K Write 421
4K Mixed 149
549% 220 MB/s
DQ Read 2,148
DQ Write 1,604
DQ Mixed 1,860
1,394% 1,870 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 489%
Great: 529%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239F482x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
208% Outstanding
MC Read 88.3
MC Write 80.5
MC Mixed 80.3
237% 83 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 208%
Great: 234%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 9% 100 181 16 30 27" 1280 720 HPN3973 HP M27h
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 240%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 303%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback