MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 17:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 296
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 836
81% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 2.6
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G-1032 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 1352 1353 1352 481 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,608
Write 1,381
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 988
300% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 84.4
300% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 664
534% 745 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 252%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 29.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 18.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 12% 60 41 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback